How to Become a Reviewer for Scientific Journals
The role of a reviewer
What do reviewers do, and why?
Reviewers evaluate article submissions to journals based on the requirements of that journal, predefined criteria, and the quality, completeness and accuracy of the research presented. They provide feedback on the paper, suggest improvements and make a recommendation to the editor about whether to take, decline or request changes to the commodity. The ultimate conclusion always rests with the editor but reviewers play a meaning role in determining the upshot.
Notice out more than most the procedure and what is involved here
Reviewing is a fourth dimension-intensive process – writing a review report tin be nearly as much work as writing a manuscript! – but it is very worthwhile for the reviewer likewise as for the customs.
Reviewers:
- ensure the rigorous standards of the scientific procedure by taking part in the peer-review arrangement.
- uphold the integrity of the journal past identifying invalid research, and helping to maintain the quality of the journal.
- fulfil a sense of obligation to the customs and their own area of research.
- institute relationships with reputable colleagues and their affiliated journals, and increase their opportunities to join an Editorial Board.
- can help forestall ethical breaches by identifying plagiarism, inquiry fraud and other problems past dint of their familiarity with the field of study.
- reciprocate professional courtesy, equally authors and reviewers are frequently interchangeable roles – as reviewer, researchers "repay" the aforementioned consideration they receive as authors.
Register your interest to exist a reviewer
Typically, reviewers are invited to conduct a review by a journal editor. Editors usually select researchers that are experts in the same subject area equally the paper. Withal, if you call up y'all would exist a expert referee for a specific journal you can volunteer to review on our Reviewer Hub. On the "Volunteer to review" section of the Reviewer Hub, you lot can search for the journal(south) of your choosing and click on "Review for journal" to indicate your interest. Please note that y'all should outset complete your reviewer profile.
Access the Reviewer Hub
Other ways to volunteer to review
- Keep an eye on the journal homepage of your choice for a "volunteer to review" pod.
- Alternatively, visit the periodical homepage and "view full editorial board", then contact the relevant editor(southward) through the site and offering your reviewing services.
Please be aware that the choice of whether or not to cull a item referee for a paper is entirely at the discretion of the editor and Elsevier plays no part in this decision.
Recognizing reviewers
Elsevier acknowledges reviewers' invaluable contribution to the progress of science. Elsevier's reviewer recognition plan aims to engage reviewers and reward them for the work they do. The program features several projects and experiments:
Reviewer Hub
The time, free energy and expertise that referees contribute to validating the work of their peers is vital to the advocacy of the academic community. Elsevier's Reviewer Hub provides reviewers with a means of showcasing their efforts and receiving credit for their piece of work.
The platform offers reviewers a personalized contour page, documenting their reviewing history and review certificates.
On the Reviewer Hub, reviewers can likewise claim their 30 days' complimentary access to Scopus and ScienceDirect.
The platform offers discounts for several Elsevier services, including Elsevier'due south WebShop, which offers professional person English language language editing, translation and illustration services for researchers preparing their manufactures, and the Elsevier Book Store.
Access the Elsevier Reviewer Hub
Peer review reports every bit manufactures
The publishing peer review reports pilot publicly recognized reviewers' intellectual contribution to accepted articles through the official publication of their reports. Review reports were attributed a separate DOI and published next to the accepted newspaper on Science Direct. If you are new to reviewing, yous are urged to consult a few of these reports to get a feel for how to provide feedback yourself. Review reports are available for the following journals via the "supplementary material" department of articles published betwixt 2015-2018. Participating journals include:
- Agronomics and Forest Meteorology
- Register of Medicine and Surgery
- Engineering Fracture Mechanics
- Periodical of Hydrology: Regional Studies
- International Journal of Surgery
Reviewer feedback plan
Nosotros regularly survey reviewers to get a better understanding of their needs and how nosotros're doing when it comes to meeting them. Findings from the reviewer feedback program aid the states to improve the reviewing experience. For example, 90% of reviewers said they would similar to exist able to see the final decision and other reviewers' comments on a newspaper, so we added this functionality to the electronic submission system.
The reviewer feedback program monitors Elsevier'southward operation from the perspective of reviewers on Elsevier journals. We'll ask you about various aspects of the reviewing system and other aspects of reviewing via an online survey. Areas of interaction and support are measured and reported regularly. Elsevier's functioning is benchmarked confronting that of other publishers.
If you take been asked to consummate our reviewer feedback programme online survey, we strongly recommend you complete it to make sure your voice is heard.
Elsevier Researcher University modules
Reviewers' Update articles
Source: https://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/role
0 Response to "How to Become a Reviewer for Scientific Journals"
Post a Comment